DotNetKick.com is an open-source project. Please report any bugs and let us know your great suggestions. Currently running svn revision 620 (rss)

Kick Spy!, Kick Zeitgeist and Kick Widgets

18
kicks
published 2 years, 3 months ago, submitted by marcos marcos 2 years, 3 months ago

petitiononline.com — A group of developers are petitioning Microsoft to change the name of the announced ".NET Framework 3.0" back to "WinFX" or another less-confusing name Enter and left your sign =)

Add a comment 6 comments | category: | Views: 0 | Get KickIt image code
tags: | tag it

new Add a live kick counter to your blog >> liveImage

You can even customize the image by choosing your own colors, and then clicking the button below to update the preview and the html code:

  • "Kick It" text
  • "Kick It" background
  • kick count text
  • kick count background
  • border

Simply copy and paste this HTML into your blog post.


Users who kicked this story:

Comments:
It should be named WinFX.
posted by gavinjoyce gavinjoyce 2 years, 3 months ago
Of course Gavin, I can´t belive how MS don't hear their users. All the post that I read about this said that is a "VERY WRONG DECITION" I hope that the petition makes to re think the name to Microsoft.
posted by marcos marcos 2 years, 3 months ago
I like .NET Framework 3.0 because thats what WinFX is...
I've been saying that WinFX is actually .NET 3.0 long before they actually renamed it and I dont understand why its a "confusing name"
posted by ekampf 2 years, 3 months ago
It's considered confusing because .NET 2.0 and C# 2.0 came out at the same time; calling the next version of .NET "3.0" before C# 3.0 comes out breaks the major version tracking.
posted by AdamVan 2 years, 3 months ago
If you read the petition ekampf you can understand a bit more why a lot of developers around the world whant a different name, the main reason is that the ".NET 3.0" run over the CLR 2.0 and, like the petition said, the WinFX are a different thing of the framework, for example you can develop aplications without using any of the features of the .NET 3.0 and the books and other resurces must reprint their books with out any rasonable reason...
posted by marcos marcos 2 years, 3 months ago
First I thought that .net 3.0 was a good name. However as marcos just said, after I read the article I now agree, it should not be called .NET 3.0. WinFX is better.
posted by Marlun 2 years, 3 months ago



information Login or create an account to comment on this story
 

Sponsored Link: www.carlist.ie

Search:

Ads via The Lounge