<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com - Stories tagged with Testing</title>
    <description>the latest stories tagged with 'Testing' from DotNetKicks.com</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Testing VB.NET code using Pex</title>
      <description>The article provides a way how Pex, a new exploratory white-box testing tool from MS Research, can be used to test legacy code written in VB.NET. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.somecreativity.com%2f2008%2f12%2f02%2fusing-pex-to-test-vbnet-code%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.somecreativity.com%2f2008%2f12%2f02%2fusing-pex-to-test-vbnet-code%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_VB_NET_code_using_Pex</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_VB_NET_code_using_Pex</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:00:32 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thoughts on IronRuby and .Net Testing</title>
      <description>Today it's very clear to me that the same thing is going to happen: IronRuby or IronPython will be used for most of the daily code, while C# will gradually serve as an infrastructure. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.logeek.fr%2f2008%2f12%2f1%2fthoughts-on-ironruby-and-dotnet-testing"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.logeek.fr%2f2008%2f12%2f1%2fthoughts-on-ironruby-and-dotnet-testing" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Thoughts_on_IronRuby_and_Net_Testing</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Thoughts_on_IronRuby_and_Net_Testing</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:46:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unittesting, mocks and loose coupling</title>
      <description>About how using mocks in unit testing couples the test tightly to the method you test &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fkhebbie.dk%2fpost%2f2008%2f11%2f30%2fUnittesting-mocks-and-loose-coupling.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fkhebbie.dk%2fpost%2f2008%2f11%2f30%2fUnittesting-mocks-and-loose-coupling.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unittesting_mocks_and_loose_coupling</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unittesting_mocks_and_loose_coupling</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 11:40:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Simple time mocking for testing time-dependent code</title>
      <description>We all love writing unit tests, don't we?. But what if you need to test code that relies on the date or some elapsed time? 

Just fake the time! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.blog.activa.be%2f2008%2f11%2f28%2fSimpleTimeMockingForTestingTimedependentCode.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.blog.activa.be%2f2008%2f11%2f28%2fSimpleTimeMockingForTestingTimedependentCode.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Simple_time_mocking_for_testing_time_dependent_code</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Simple_time_mocking_for_testing_time_dependent_code</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:46:28 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TDD in Practice - Dealing with Hard-To-Test Areas - developerFusion - </title>
      <description>Tried TDD and abandoned it the moment you've tried it on 'real' code? Learn how to tackle these 'hard-to-test' areas, that those presentations and introductory books just don't seem to explain well. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.developerfusion.com%2farticle%2f9375%2ftdd-in-practice-dealing-with-hardtotest-areas%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.developerfusion.com%2farticle%2f9375%2ftdd-in-practice-dealing-with-hardtotest-areas%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/TDD_in_Practice_Dealing_with_Hard_To_Test_Areas_developerFusion</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/TDD_in_Practice_Dealing_with_Hard_To_Test_Areas_developerFusion</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Code Contracts - TDD in a DbC World </title>
      <description>As developers start to discover the upcoming Code Contracts for .NET 4.0, it's important to understand not only Design by Contract, and TDD, but how they can complement each other.  For business value, we as developers need to flush out our design through the use of TDD, and we can refactor into using contracts for our constraints over time.  With these methodologies in place, the edge cases will melt away and help us ensure DRY and write more concise code directly having business value. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fmatthew.podwysocki%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f25%2fcode-contracts-dbc-in-a-tdd-world.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fmatthew.podwysocki%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f25%2fcode-contracts-dbc-in-a-tdd-world.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Code_Contracts_TDD_in_a_DbC_World</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Code_Contracts_TDD_in_a_DbC_World</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:36:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unit testing with Pex</title>
      <description>A quick introduction to using the Microsoft Pex tool to create unit tests. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2flabs.dropit.se%2fblogs%2fpost%2f2008%2f11%2f27%2fUnit-testing-with-Pex.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2flabs.dropit.se%2fblogs%2fpost%2f2008%2f11%2f27%2fUnit-testing-with-Pex.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_testing_with_Pex</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_testing_with_Pex</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 08:56:19 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unit Testing in JavaScript</title>
      <description>
Last week a colleague asked for my help finding better unit test tools for Java Script. He's done some digging on the state of the art with JavaScript unit tests and finds the whole lot wanting... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.notesfromatooluser.com%2f2008%2f11%2funit-testing-in-javascript.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.notesfromatooluser.com%2f2008%2f11%2funit-testing-in-javascript.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_Testing_in_JavaScript</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_Testing_in_JavaScript</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:28:44 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Test Private Methods, Yes or No?</title>
      <description>Should you test private method???
Read my opinion and end up improving your code design.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.microsoft.co.il%2fblogs%2fkolbis%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f25%2fanswer-test-private-methods.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.microsoft.co.il%2fblogs%2fkolbis%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f25%2fanswer-test-private-methods.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Test_Private_Methods_Yes_or_No</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Test_Private_Methods_Yes_or_No</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing WCF Service Apps (1 of 4)</title>
      <description>One of the most beautiful things about the WCF framework is the way it was designed to be more testable than ASPX services.  When you design your WCF interface, you are mostly just designing an interface with the WCF ServiceContract attributes.  The WCF framework uses your interface to determine the actual contract and transport mechanism so you don't have to.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fgeekswithblogs.net%2fHouseOfBilz%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f24%2ftesting-wcf-service-apps-part-1-of-4.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fgeekswithblogs.net%2fHouseOfBilz%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f24%2ftesting-wcf-service-apps-part-1-of-4.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_WCF_Service_Apps_1_of_4</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_WCF_Service_Apps_1_of_4</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:43:11 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mocking, Good Or Bad?</title>
      <description>My opinion on mocking frameworks.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.microsoft.co.il%2fblogs%2fkolbis%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f08%2fmy-opinion-on-mocking.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.microsoft.co.il%2fblogs%2fkolbis%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f08%2fmy-opinion-on-mocking.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Mocking_Good_Or_Bad</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Mocking_Good_Or_Bad</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:15:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Different Types of Automated Tests</title>
      <description>When I first learnt about NUnit , I thought that all the tests that are written in NUnit are unit tests. And all the tests that are written using other tools and languages-- including scripting tools are integration tests. Now I know how wrong I was. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fitscommonsensestupid.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f11%2fdifferent-types-of-automated-tests.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fitscommonsensestupid.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f11%2fdifferent-types-of-automated-tests.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Different_Types_of_Automated_Tests</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Different_Types_of_Automated_Tests</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:44:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing is hard but debugging just sucks A$$</title>
      <description>&amp;quot;At the users group I asked the question to the group 'who creates automated tests as part of their daily development cycle?'.  After I asked this question I followed it up with, and if you don't WHY, WHY, WHY, WHY......  Below are some of the answers I received (btw, not the first time I have heard these reasons).&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2fderik_whittaker%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f14%2ftesting-is-hard-but-debugging-just-sucks-a.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2fderik_whittaker%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f14%2ftesting-is-hard-but-debugging-just-sucks-a.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_is_hard_but_debugging_just_sucks_A</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_is_hard_but_debugging_just_sucks_A</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MisBehave 0.1: Oslo's MGrammar for BDD Executable Specifications</title>
      <description>This is a great article on using Microsoft Oslo to create automated acceptance tests with Behavior-Driven Development style syntax &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.claudioperrone.com%2fblog%2farticles%2f2008%2f11%2f09%2fmisbehave-01-oslos-mgrammar-for-bdd-executable-specifications%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.claudioperrone.com%2fblog%2farticles%2f2008%2f11%2f09%2fmisbehave-01-oslos-mgrammar-for-bdd-executable-specifications%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/MisBehave_0_1_Oslo_s_MGrammar_for_BDD_Executable_Specifications</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/MisBehave_0_1_Oslo_s_MGrammar_for_BDD_Executable_Specifications</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 08:54:28 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>.NET Projects: Code Coverage with NCover</title>
      <description>Some explanation of what code coverage is, how it is useful, and how to track it using NCover. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fgrantpalin.com%2f2008%2f10%2f23%2fnet-projects-code-coverage-with-ncover%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fgrantpalin.com%2f2008%2f10%2f23%2fnet-projects-code-coverage-with-ncover%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/NET_Projects_Code_Coverage_with_NCover</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/NET_Projects_Code_Coverage_with_NCover</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:16:51 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When to use static methods</title>
      <description>Rule of thumb on when to use static methods and when they are evil. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.mendeltsiebenga.com%2fpost%2fWhen-to-use-static-methods.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.mendeltsiebenga.com%2fpost%2fWhen-to-use-static-methods.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/When_to_use_static_methods</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/When_to_use_static_methods</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:27:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unit Testing Change Notification</title>
      <description>Simplifying the way I assert change notification for properties in unit tests. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicious.com%2fblogs%2fchristopher_bennage%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f13%2funit-testing-change-notification.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicious.com%2fblogs%2fchristopher_bennage%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f13%2funit-testing-change-notification.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_Testing_Change_Notification</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_Testing_Change_Notification</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:33:50 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can developers test their own code?</title>
      <description>A response to the claim that developers shouldn't test their code! Can developers be trusted? Campbell discusses the kind of tests developers should be writing, and what could be better left for the testers.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.developerfusion.com%2fcolumn%2f9184%2fcan-developers-test-their-own-code%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.developerfusion.com%2fcolumn%2f9184%2fcan-developers-test-their-own-code%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Can_developers_test_their_own_code</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Can_developers_test_their_own_code</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:10:38 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introduction to the AutoMocking Conatiner in StructureMap</title>
      <description>A short screencast introduction on how to use the AutoMocking Conatiner in StructureMap &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dimecasts.net%2fCasts%2fCastDetails%2f62"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dimecasts.net%2fCasts%2fCastDetails%2f62" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Introduction_to_the_AutoMocking_Conatiner_in_StructureMap</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Introduction_to_the_AutoMocking_Conatiner_in_StructureMap</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:16:06 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Partial Mocks with the StructureMap AutoMocker</title>
      <description>If you have not checked out the new AutoMocking Container that is part of StructureMap 2.5 I would highly suggest you do, it rocks.

I thought I would show how simple it is to create a PartialMock on the Class under Test (CUT) when using the RhinoAutoMocker.

Our Class we want to mock &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2fderik_whittaker%2farchive%2f2008%2f10%2f10%2fpartial-mocks-with-the-structuremap-automocker.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2fderik_whittaker%2farchive%2f2008%2f10%2f10%2fpartial-mocks-with-the-structuremap-automocker.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Partial_Mocks_with_the_StructureMap_AutoMocker</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Partial_Mocks_with_the_StructureMap_AutoMocker</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:45:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UI test automation using Team System</title>
      <description>This article illustrates how VSTS can be leveraged to automate testing of winforms UI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.somecreativity.com%2f2008%2f11%2f06%2fautomating-windows-forms-ui-testing%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.somecreativity.com%2f2008%2f11%2f06%2fautomating-windows-forms-ui-testing%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/UI_test_automation_using_Team_System</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/UI_test_automation_using_Team_System</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:58:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Compare / Test the Equality of two Queries in SQL Server</title>
      <description>Compare / Test the Equality of two Queries in SQL Server using this short T-SQL &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.troyd.net%2fHow%2bTo%2bCompare%2b%2bTest%2bThe%2bEquality%2bOf%2bTwo%2bQueries%2bIn%2bSQL%2bServer%2bWith%2bSQL.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.troyd.net%2fHow%2bTo%2bCompare%2b%2bTest%2bThe%2bEquality%2bOf%2bTwo%2bQueries%2bIn%2bSQL%2bServer%2bWith%2bSQL.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/How_to_Compare_Test_the_Equality_of_two_Queries_in_SQL_Server</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/How_to_Compare_Test_the_Equality_of_two_Queries_in_SQL_Server</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:01:07 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gallio, the framework-agnostic test runner for .NET</title>
      <description>Gallio is a open source, framework-agnostic test runner that supports MbUnit, MSTest, NBehave, NUnit, and xUnit.Net frameworks. It provides tool support and integration with  CCNet,  MSBuild, NAnt, NCover, Pex,  Powershell, Resharper, TestDriven.Net, TypeMock, and Visual Studio Team System. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fricharddingwall.name%2f2008%2f09%2f26%2fgallio-the-framework-agnostic-test-runner-for-net%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fricharddingwall.name%2f2008%2f09%2f26%2fgallio-the-framework-agnostic-test-runner-for-net%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Gallio_the_framework_agnostic_test_runner_for_NET</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Gallio_the_framework_agnostic_test_runner_for_NET</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 12:46:56 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Creating a culture of quality: Part 1</title>
      <description>Starting our new series from tech start-ups, Bob from Huddle explains how they tackle the challenge of maintaining high quality code, when the last thing developers want to do is test.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.developerfusion.com%2fcolumn%2f8314%2fcreating-a-culture-of-quality-part-1%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.developerfusion.com%2fcolumn%2f8314%2fcreating-a-culture-of-quality-part-1%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Creating_a_culture_of_quality_Part_1</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Creating_a_culture_of_quality_Part_1</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 14:00:28 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Test Compact Framework Code with Passive View</title>
      <description>Testing a Compact Framework Windows Forms application using retargeting and Passive View. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fbroloco.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f10%2ftest-compact-framework-code-with.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fbroloco.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f10%2ftest-compact-framework-code-with.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/compactframework/Test_Compact_Framework_Code_with_Passive_View</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/compactframework/Test_Compact_Framework_Code_with_Passive_View</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:08:50 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>